Sign in to keep reading
“The Five Dimensions” is free with an account. Your progress and bookmarks follow you across devices.
Sign in to continueNEW: ML Mock & Coaching with a 20+ year experience coach. Save $20 on sessions for Premium.ML Mock & Coaching now available
NEW: ML Mock & Coaching with a 20+ year experience coach. Save $20 on sessions for Premium.ML Mock & Coaching now available
The rubric, derived from the two sessions you have just read — AI Fluency, Complement, Completeness, Design, and Red Flags, and why the last one is a gate rather than a score.
“The Five Dimensions” is free with an account. Your progress and bookmarks follow you across devices.
Sign in to continueScore Your Own Hour
Could you answer these today? Tick what you already know.
Everything so far has been one interview, twice. Now the generalisation — and it is worth noticing that it arrives after the evidence rather than before it, because a rubric handed over cold is a list of words, while a rubric pulled out of something you have watched is a lens.
Line the two sessions up and the differences sort into exactly five groups.
| The Five Dimensions | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimension | The question it asks | Where you saw it |
| AI Fluency | Can you direct the tool, and recognise immediately when it is wrong? | Minute 20 — reading the confident wrong generation instead of re-prompting |
| Complement | Is the division of labour sound, and did you make it visible? | Minute 27 — naming eviction as yours before delegating the bookkeeping |
| Completeness | Did you finish, and can you prove it? | Minute 7 — building a failing case so the fix could be verified |
| Design | Is the thing you shipped actually good? | Minute 22 — a three-line fix instead of an accepted rewrite |
| Red Flags | Can your account of your own work be trusted? | Minute 21 of the failed run — unable to say what the bug was |
Four of these are scored on a scale. The fifth is not, and that distinction is the most important structural fact about this round.